Tuesday 23 September 2014

EcoCash’s Global Manoeuvres: It’s a Alliances Game


It is now clearer that EcoCash, a mobile phone based banking service provider headquartered in Zimbabwe is trying to enter the global payment system. And it is looking at the most cost effective method of doing just that. EcoCash is one of the few mobile money sprinters in the league of MPESA curved out of Econet Wireless a mobile network operator based in Zimbabwe.  
 
The mobile phone bank operator has tried several attempts to enter the global payment system. It has integrated its mobile banking platform with the roaming service to enable its customers to travel with their mobile wallet (m-wallet). One weakness of that move has been the need for a physical agent to cash in/out the m-wallet. In order to circumvent this problem, the mobile money service provider partnered with WesternUnion to have a global presence in more than 200 countries saved by WesternUnion. However, this channel did not fully solve the problem as challenges of inconvenience remained. WesternUnion operates in scheduled offices and its office distribution is sparsed to meet the demands of a sophisticated mobile money client. 
  
The recent moves to partner MasterCard are a clear testimony of the mobile money operator’s spirited intentions to become an emerging global contender through innovation on its payment system. One can be pardoned for observing this integration of a-payment-system-on-a-payment-system as a sign of failure by mobile money to handle transactions at the point-of-sale and cross-country mobility. EcoCash has, however, countered that downside of mobile money through the introduction of the MasterCard debit card linked to its mobile money platform to effectively handle point-of-sale transactions and global mobility. 
EcoCash continues to innovate around its mobile money platform with a vision to reach the global market. It may be a matter of time to determine which between MPESA and EcoCash will lead as a global contender. MPESA looks comfortable in its Kenyan backyard where it has registered enormous success while EcoCash has looked for markets beyond the small market of Zimbabwe. This could be born out of the parent company’s strategy of following emigrated Zimbabweans at a lower cost than direct investment and having to go through the usual bureaucratic rituals of foreign direct investment. 
What remains unclear about EcoCash’s payment ecosystem strategy of m-wallet on roaming, WesternUnion and MasterCard is how they will complement each other to capture the global market beyond emigrated Zimbabweans. What is however obtrusively clear is its grand vision to contend in the global payment system and build a global mobile money based payment system.
This alliance can work very well for creative Zimbabweans where a student studying in Australia, for example, keeps the MasterCard debit card while the family keeps the mobile phone linked to the debit card to replenish the card with financial support. One intriguing observation is how the forgoing scenario makes the global payment instantaneous. The real danger for EcoCash is the scalability of the system to attract non-Zimbabwean customers. Without that, EcoCash’s global manoeuvre is foiled, waiting for an operator from the big market like Nigeria or having a footprint across Africa to seize.
The learning points from EcoCash’s strategy clearly shows that it is cheaper and easy to reach new market frontiers by integrating the mobile banking system with traditional banking systems. Over and above that, mobile money operators should continue to explore ways of reducing the current cumbersomeness of paying with mobile wallet where one has to queue to cashout into hard cash and then queue to pay at the point-of-sale.


Last Mazambani